New Caledonia vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

New Caledonia
330,000 current US$
in 1999
OECD members
590,000 current US$
in 2022
New Caledonia rank
43rd
OECD members rank
42nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • New Caledonia
  • OECD members
0500.0k1.0M1.5M197219972022

How they compare

OECD members currently reports 590,000 current US$ against 330,000 current US$ in New Caledonia, a difference of 260,000 current US$.

That makes OECD members's figure about 1.8 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1987 it was OECD members ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 43rd and OECD members ranks 42nd of 114 countries.

OECD members has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia OECD members Difference Ahead
1980s 20,000 current US$ 110,000 current US$ 90,000 current US$ OECD members
1990s 239,000 current US$ 489,000 current US$ 250,000 current US$ OECD members

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), New Caledonia or OECD members?
OECD members, at 590,000 current US$ against 330,000 current US$ in New Caledonia as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between New Caledonia and OECD members?
260,000 current US$, with OECD members ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and OECD members?
13 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 1999.
How do New Caledonia and OECD members rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
New Caledonia ranks 43rd and OECD members ranks 42nd of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-gaps-filled/new-caledonia/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-gaps-filled/new-caledonia/oecd-members/">New Caledonia vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
159 places, 5,626 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.