Pakistan vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Pakistan
- Rwanda
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 1.24 million current US$ against 859,528 current US$ in Rwanda, a difference of 382,202 current US$.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.4 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Rwanda ahead.
Pakistan ranks 27th and Rwanda ranks 30th of 114 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 198,333 current US$ | 439,167 current US$ | 240,833 current US$ | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 553,750 current US$ | 82,500 current US$ | 471,250 current US$ | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 1.10 million current US$ | 873,420 current US$ | 223,003 current US$ | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Pakistan or Rwanda?
- Pakistan, at 1.24 million current US$ against 859,528 current US$ in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Pakistan and Rwanda?
- 382,202 current US$, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Rwanda?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
- How do Pakistan and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Pakistan ranks 27th and Rwanda ranks 30th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.