Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
6.44 million current US$
in 2022
Uruguay
760,000 current US$
in 2017
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
30th
Uruguay rank
32nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Uruguay
05.0M10.0M15.0M197219972022

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) currently reports 6.44 million current US$ against 760,000 current US$ in Uruguay, a difference of 5.68 million current US$.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s figure about 8.5 times Uruguay's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 30th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 45 groups.

Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 2.98 million current US$ 108,889 current US$ 2.87 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
2000s 9.32 million current US$ 120,000 current US$ 9.20 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
2010s 7.37 million current US$ 428,750 current US$ 6.94 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) or Uruguay?
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), at 6.44 million current US$ against 760,000 current US$ in Uruguay as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) and Uruguay?
5.68 million current US$, with Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) and Uruguay?
27 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2017.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) and Uruguay rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 30th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-gaps-filled/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-gaps-filled/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/uruguay/">Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
159 places, 5,626 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.