Uruguay vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Uruguay
- Zambia
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 760,000 current US$ against 516,249 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 243,751 current US$.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.5 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zambia ahead.
Uruguay ranks 32nd and Zambia ranks 34th of 114 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uruguay | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 108,889 current US$ | 157,778 current US$ | 48,889 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2000s | 120,000 current US$ | 652,000 current US$ | 532,000 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2010s | 428,750 current US$ | 848,750 current US$ | 420,000 current US$ | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Uruguay or Zambia?
- Uruguay, at 760,000 current US$ against 516,249 current US$ in Zambia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Uruguay and Zambia?
- 243,751 current US$, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uruguay and Zambia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2017.
- How do Uruguay and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Uruguay ranks 32nd and Zambia ranks 34th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.