Early-demographic dividend vs Laos: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New … New Zealand capita

Early-demographic dividend
0.0357 current US$ per person
in 2022
Laos
0.822 current US$ per person
in 2023
Early-demographic dividend rank
16th
Laos rank
16th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New … New Zealand capita over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Laos
00.250.50.751197219972023

How they compare

Laos currently reports 0.822 current US$ per person against 0.0357 current US$ per person in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.7863 current US$ per person.

That makes Laos's figure about 23.0 times Early-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Laos ahead.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 16th and Laos ranks 16th of 45 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Early-demographic dividend averaged higher in 1 and Laos in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Laos Difference Ahead
1970s 0.01 current US$ per person 0.0419 current US$ per person 0.0319 current US$ per person Laos
1980s 0.0092 current US$ per person 0.0034 current US$ per person 0.0057 current US$ per person Early-demographic dividend
1990s 0.0145 current US$ per person 0.0746 current US$ per person 0.0601 current US$ per person Laos
2000s 0.0252 current US$ per person 0.2461 current US$ per person 0.2209 current US$ per person Laos
2010s 0.0479 current US$ per person 0.6837 current US$ per person 0.6357 current US$ per person Laos
2020s 0.0495 current US$ per person 0.7923 current US$ per person 0.7428 current US$ per person Laos

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Early-demographic dividend or Laos?
Laos, at 0.822 current US$ per person against 0.0357 current US$ per person in Early-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Early-demographic dividend and Laos?
0.7863 current US$ per person, with Laos ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Laos?
48 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2022.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Laos rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 16th and Laos ranks 16th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Laos: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-capita/early-demographic-dividend/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-capita/early-demographic-dividend/lao-pdr/">Early-demographic dividend vs Laos: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
159 places, 5,336 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.