Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0.0241 current US$ per person
in 2023
Uruguay
0.2243 current US$ per person
in 2017
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
21st
Uruguay rank
21st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
  • Uruguay
00.050.10.150.20.25197019962023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.2243 current US$ per person against 0.0241 current US$ per person in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 0.2002 current US$ per person.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 9.3 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Uruguay ahead.

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 21st and Uruguay ranks 21st of 45 groups.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0054 current US$ per person 0.034 current US$ per person 0.0286 current US$ per person Uruguay
2000s 0.0134 current US$ per person 0.0366 current US$ per person 0.0232 current US$ per person Uruguay
2010s 0.01 current US$ per person 0.1273 current US$ per person 0.1173 current US$ per person Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0.2243 current US$ per person against 0.0241 current US$ per person in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2017.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Uruguay?
0.2002 current US$ per person, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Uruguay?
27 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2017.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Uruguay rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 21st and Uruguay ranks 21st of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-capita/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-capita/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/uruguay/">Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
159 places, 5,336 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.