Bangladesh vs IDA only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

Bangladesh
106.22 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA only
5.34 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Bangladesh rank
13th
IDA only rank
11th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • Bangladesh
  • IDA only
0255075100197219972023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 106.22 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.34 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA only, a difference of 100.88 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 19.9 times IDA only's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 13th and IDA only ranks 11th of 112 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 4 and IDA only in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh IDA only Difference Ahead
1970s 7.45 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4586 current US$ per square kilometre 6.99 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 0.8143 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6911 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1232 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre 1.37 current US$ per square kilometre 0.441 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 7.08 current US$ per square kilometre 3.11 current US$ per square kilometre 3.97 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 2.94 current US$ per square kilometre 6.15 current US$ per square kilometre 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre IDA only
2020s 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre 7.14 current US$ per square kilometre 4.83 current US$ per square kilometre IDA only

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Bangladesh or IDA only?
Bangladesh, at 106.22 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.34 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Bangladesh and IDA only?
100.88 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and IDA only?
51 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2022.
How do Bangladesh and IDA only rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
Bangladesh ranks 13th and IDA only ranks 11th of 112 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs IDA only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/ida-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/ida-only/">Bangladesh vs IDA only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 5,308 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.