Burundi vs French Polynesia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Burundi
48.68 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2005
French Polynesia
46.45 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Burundi rank
18th
French Polynesia rank
20th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Burundi
- French Polynesia
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 48.68 current US$ per square kilometre against 46.45 current US$ per square kilometre in French Polynesia, a difference of 2.23 current US$ per square kilometre.
Across all 6 years both countries report, French Polynesia has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 18th and French Polynesia ranks 20th of 112 countries.
French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Burundi or French Polynesia?
- Burundi, at 48.68 current US$ per square kilometre against 46.45 current US$ per square kilometre in French Polynesia as of 2005.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Burundi and French Polynesia?
- 2.23 current US$ per square kilometre, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and French Polynesia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 1999.
- How do Burundi and French Polynesia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Burundi ranks 18th and French Polynesia ranks 20th of 112 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.