Early-demographic dividend vs Malta: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

Early-demographic dividend
3.72 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Malta
62.5 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2001
Early-demographic dividend rank
16th
Malta rank
16th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Malta
0255075100125197219972022

How they compare

Malta currently reports 62.5 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.72 current US$ per square kilometre in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 58.78 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 16.8 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 16th and Malta ranks 16th of 45 groups.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Malta Difference Ahead
1970s 0.5298 current US$ per square kilometre 72.92 current US$ per square kilometre 72.39 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre 93.75 current US$ per square kilometre 92.53 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre 62.5 current US$ per square kilometre 61.33 current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Early-demographic dividend or Malta?
Malta, at 62.5 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.72 current US$ per square kilometre in Early-demographic dividend as of 2001.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Early-demographic dividend and Malta?
58.78 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Malta?
8 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2001.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Malta rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 16th and Malta ranks 16th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Malta: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/early-demographic-dividend/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/early-demographic-dividend/malta/">Early-demographic dividend vs Malta: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 5,308 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.