Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

Eswatini
0.0855 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0994 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
89th
Zimbabwe rank
87th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Zimbabwe
02.557.510197219972023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0994 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0855 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0139 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 89th and Zimbabwe ranks 87th of 112 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1357 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8817 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.5814 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1551 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4263 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9823 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4712 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre 1.31 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 3.96 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9527 current US$ per square kilometre 3.01 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3553 current US$ per square kilometre 2.26 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Eswatini or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0994 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0855 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
0.0139 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
25 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
Eswatini ranks 89th and Zimbabwe ranks 87th of 112 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/zimbabwe/">Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 5,308 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.