High income vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

High income
0.0377 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
5.83 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
High income rank
42nd
Sri Lanka rank
40th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • High income
  • Sri Lanka
0204060197019962023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 5.83 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0377 current US$ per square kilometre in High income, a difference of 5.79 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 154.8 times High income's.

Across all 51 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

High income ranks 42nd and Sri Lanka ranks 40th of 45 groups.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade High income Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0198 current US$ per square kilometre 5.52 current US$ per square kilometre 5.5 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7973 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7922 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 0.017 current US$ per square kilometre 3.94 current US$ per square kilometre 3.92 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 0.0211 current US$ per square kilometre 18.83 current US$ per square kilometre 18.81 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 0.0568 current US$ per square kilometre 16.34 current US$ per square kilometre 16.28 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 0.0667 current US$ per square kilometre 12.9 current US$ per square kilometre 12.83 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), High income or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 5.83 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0377 current US$ per square kilometre in High income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between High income and Sri Lanka?
5.79 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Sri Lanka?
51 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do High income and Sri Lanka rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
High income ranks 42nd and Sri Lanka ranks 40th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

High income vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/high-income/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/high-income/sri-lanka/">High income vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 5,308 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.