Hong Kong, China vs Post-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

Hong Kong, China
9.52 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
Post-demographic dividend
0.1576 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Hong Kong, China rank
36th
Post-demographic dividend rank
39th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Post-demographic dividend
050100150197219972022

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 9.52 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.1576 current US$ per square kilometre in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 9.36 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 60.4 times Post-demographic dividend's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 36th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 39th of 112 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Post-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1970s 19.61 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0178 current US$ per square kilometre 19.59 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 47.69 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0116 current US$ per square kilometre 47.68 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Hong Kong, China or Post-demographic dividend?
Hong Kong, China, at 9.52 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.1576 current US$ per square kilometre in Post-demographic dividend as of 1996.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Hong Kong, China and Post-demographic dividend?
9.36 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Post-demographic dividend?
6 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 1996.
How do Hong Kong, China and Post-demographic dividend rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
Hong Kong, China ranks 36th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 39th of 112 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Post-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/post-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/post-demographic-dividend/">Hong Kong, China vs Post-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 5,308 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.