Hong Kong, China vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 9.52 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.2694 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 9.25 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 35.3 times Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 36th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 34th of 112 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 19.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0067 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.6 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 1990s | 47.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1055 current US$ per square kilometre | 47.59 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Hong Kong, China or Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Hong Kong, China, at 9.52 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.2694 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 1996.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Hong Kong, China and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- 9.25 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 1996.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 36th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 34th of 112 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.