IBRD only vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

IBRD only
0.298 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Singapore
14.93 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1993
IBRD only rank
31st
Singapore rank
32nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • IBRD only
  • Singapore
05001.0k1.5k197219972022

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 14.93 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.298 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 14.63 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 50.1 times IBRD only's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

IBRD only ranks 31st and Singapore ranks 32nd of 45 groups.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Singapore Difference Ahead
1970s 0.2007 current US$ per square kilometre 358.21 current US$ per square kilometre 358.01 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 0.1189 current US$ per square kilometre 147.76 current US$ per square kilometre 147.64 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 0.1322 current US$ per square kilometre 421.64 current US$ per square kilometre 421.51 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), IBRD only or Singapore?
Singapore, at 14.93 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.298 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 1993.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between IBRD only and Singapore?
14.63 current US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Singapore?
22 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 1993.
How do IBRD only and Singapore rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
IBRD only ranks 31st and Singapore ranks 32nd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/singapore/">IBRD only vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 5,308 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.