Least developed countries vs Malta: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

Least developed countries
3.89 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Malta
62.5 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2001
Least developed countries rank
15th
Malta rank
16th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Malta
0255075100125197219972022

How they compare

Malta currently reports 62.5 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.89 current US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 58.61 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 16.1 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 15th and Malta ranks 16th of 45 groups.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Malta Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1523 current US$ per square kilometre 72.92 current US$ per square kilometre 72.76 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 0.7429 current US$ per square kilometre 93.75 current US$ per square kilometre 93.01 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 0.9452 current US$ per square kilometre 62.5 current US$ per square kilometre 61.55 current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Least developed countries or Malta?
Malta, at 62.5 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.89 current US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2001.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Least developed countries and Malta?
58.61 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Malta?
8 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2001.
How do Least developed countries and Malta rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
Least developed countries ranks 15th and Malta ranks 16th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Malta: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/malta/">Least developed countries vs Malta: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 5,308 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.