Maldives vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

Maldives
41.05 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2019
Sub-Saharan Africa
1.27 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Maldives rank
21st
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
23rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • Maldives
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k197019962023

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 41.05 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 39.78 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Maldives's figure about 32.4 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 45 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.

Maldives ranks 21st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 23rd of 112 countries.

Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Maldives Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 166.67 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0326 current US$ per square kilometre 166.63 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
1980s 66.67 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0428 current US$ per square kilometre 66.62 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
1990s 503.33 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1474 current US$ per square kilometre 503.19 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2000s 1,467 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4888 current US$ per square kilometre 1,466 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2010s 656.01 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4472 current US$ per square kilometre 655.57 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Maldives or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Maldives, at 41.05 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2019.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Maldives and Sub-Saharan Africa?
39.78 current US$ per square kilometre, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Sub-Saharan Africa?
45 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2019.
How do Maldives and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
Maldives ranks 21st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 23rd of 112 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Maldives vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/maldives/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/maldives/sub-saharan-africa/">Maldives vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 5,308 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.