OECD members vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

OECD members
0.0167 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Uruguay
4.34 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
OECD members rank
43rd
Uruguay rank
43rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • OECD members
  • Uruguay
01234197219972022

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 4.34 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0167 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 4.32 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 260.0 times OECD members's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 43rd and Uruguay ranks 43rd of 45 groups.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0148 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6222 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6074 current US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 0.021 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6856 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6647 current US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 0.0287 current US$ per square kilometre 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre 2.42 current US$ per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), OECD members or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 4.34 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0167 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2017.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between OECD members and Uruguay?
4.32 current US$ per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Uruguay?
27 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2017.
How do OECD members and Uruguay rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
OECD members ranks 43rd and Uruguay ranks 43rd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/uruguay/">OECD members vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 5,308 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.