Rwanda vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

Rwanda
34.84 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
1.27 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
24th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
23rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0204060197019962023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 34.84 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 33.57 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 27.5 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 24th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 23rd of 112 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 20.84 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1992 current US$ per square kilometre 20.64 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 3.34 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4715 current US$ per square kilometre 2.87 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 5.59 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4792 current US$ per square kilometre 5.11 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 38.69 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6892 current US$ per square kilometre 38 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Rwanda or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Rwanda, at 34.84 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Rwanda and Sub-Saharan Africa?
33.57 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sub-Saharan Africa?
23 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
Rwanda ranks 24th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 23rd of 112 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sub-saharan-africa/">Rwanda vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 5,308 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.