Eritrea vs Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

Eritrea
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2005
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Eritrea rank
34th
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank
35th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • Eritrea
  • Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
00.0010.0010.002197019962023

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), a difference of 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 32.8 times Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 34th and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 35th of 110 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eritrea
2000s 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Eritrea or Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
Eritrea, at 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) as of 2005.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Eritrea and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
8 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
How do Eritrea and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
Eritrea ranks 34th and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 35th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/eritrea/latin-america-and-caribbean-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/eritrea/latin-america-and-caribbean-excluding-high-income/">Eritrea vs Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 5,230 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.