OECD members vs Tajikistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
OECD members
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Tajikistan
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2006
OECD members rank
43rd
Tajikistan rank
40th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- OECD members
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in OECD members, a difference of 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1,835.1 times OECD members's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
OECD members ranks 43rd and Tajikistan ranks 40th of 45 groups.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), OECD members or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in OECD members as of 2006.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between OECD members and Tajikistan?
- 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Tajikistan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2006.
- How do OECD members and Tajikistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- OECD members ranks 43rd and Tajikistan ranks 40th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.