Eritrea vs Palau: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand

Eritrea
30,000 current US$
in 2005
Palau
32,069 current US$
in 2023
Eritrea rank
72nd
Palau rank
71st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand over time

  • Eritrea
  • Palau
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M199320082023

How they compare

Palau currently reports 32,069 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in Eritrea, a difference of 2,069 current US$.

That makes Palau's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eritrea ahead.

Eritrea ranks 72nd and Palau ranks 71st of 114 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand, Eritrea or Palau?
Palau, at 32,069 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand between Eritrea and Palau?
2,069 current US$, with Palau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Palau?
6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2005.
How do Eritrea and Palau rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand?
Eritrea ranks 72nd and Palau ranks 71st of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Palau: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us/eritrea/palau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us/eritrea/palau/">Eritrea vs Palau: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
159 places, 5,336 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.