Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
4.91 million current US$
in 2022
Uruguay
760,000 current US$
in 2017
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
35th
Uruguay rank
32nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Uruguay
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M199120062022

How they compare

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) currently reports 4.91 million current US$ against 760,000 current US$ in Uruguay, a difference of 4.15 million current US$.

That makes Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s figure about 6.5 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uruguay ahead.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 35th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 45 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 233,750 current US$ 120,000 current US$ 113,750 current US$ Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
2000s 207,778 current US$ 127,778 current US$ 80,000 current US$ Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
2010s 72,500 current US$ 380,000 current US$ 307,500 current US$ Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) or Uruguay?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), at 4.91 million current US$ against 760,000 current US$ in Uruguay as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand between Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Uruguay?
4.15 million current US$, with Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Uruguay?
21 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Uruguay rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 35th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/uruguay/">Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
159 places, 5,336 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.