Grenada vs Saint Lucia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand over time
- Grenada
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 93 current US$ against 88 current US$ in Saint Lucia, a difference of 5 current US$.
That makes Grenada's figure about 1.1 times Saint Lucia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 113th and Saint Lucia ranks 114th of 114 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 35,000 current US$ | 25,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | Grenada |
| 2000s | 80,000 current US$ | 86,667 current US$ | 6,667 current US$ | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 53,084 current US$ | 135,714 current US$ | 82,630 current US$ | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 64,456 current US$ | 188,574 current US$ | 124,118 current US$ | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand, Grenada or Saint Lucia?
- Grenada, at 93 current US$ against 88 current US$ in Saint Lucia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand between Grenada and Saint Lucia?
- 5 current US$, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Saint Lucia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Grenada and Saint Lucia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand?
- Grenada ranks 113th and Saint Lucia ranks 114th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.