Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand

Sub-Saharan Africa
30.31 million current US$
in 2023
Tuvalu
9.78 million current US$
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
17th
Tuvalu rank
14th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Tuvalu
010.0M20.0M30.0M197019962023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 30.31 million current US$ against 9.78 million current US$ in Tuvalu, a difference of 20.53 million current US$.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 3.1 times Tuvalu's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 17th and Tuvalu ranks 14th of 45 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Sub-Saharan Africa averaged higher in 5 and Tuvalu in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1970s 833,333 current US$ 66,667 current US$ 766,667 current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 656,000 current US$ 1.23 million current US$ 578,000 current US$ Tuvalu
1990s 3.11 million current US$ 1.29 million current US$ 1.83 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 10.44 million current US$ 1.64 million current US$ 8.79 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 10.40 million current US$ 5.80 million current US$ 4.60 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 16.47 million current US$ 6.74 million current US$ 9.74 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand, Sub-Saharan Africa or Tuvalu?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 30.31 million current US$ against 9.78 million current US$ in Tuvalu as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand between Sub-Saharan Africa and Tuvalu?
20.53 million current US$, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Tuvalu?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Tuvalu rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 17th and Tuvalu ranks 14th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us/sub-saharan-africa/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us/sub-saharan-africa/tuvalu/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
159 places, 5,336 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.