Bhutan vs Slovakia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps
Bhutan
68,764 current US$
in 2021
Slovakia
70,000 current US$
in 2004
Bhutan rank
114th
Slovakia rank
113th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps over time
- Bhutan
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 70,000 current US$ against 68,764 current US$ in Bhutan, a difference of 1,236 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 114th and Slovakia ranks 113th of 143 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.90 million current US$ | 362,000 current US$ | 1.53 million current US$ | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 1.07 million current US$ | 234,000 current US$ | 840,000 current US$ | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps, Bhutan or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 70,000 current US$ against 68,764 current US$ in Bhutan as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps between Bhutan and Slovakia?
- 1,236 current US$, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Slovakia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Bhutan and Slovakia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
- Bhutan ranks 114th and Slovakia ranks 113th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.