Brazil vs Russia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway … Norway gaps
Brazil
29.86 million current US$
in 2023
Russia
29.62 million current US$
in 2004
Brazil rank
21st
Russia rank
22nd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway … Norway gaps over time
- Brazil
- Russia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 29.86 million current US$ against 29.62 million current US$ in Russia, a difference of 235,600 current US$.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Russia has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 21st and Russia ranks 22nd of 143 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.71 million current US$ | 21.51 million current US$ | 19.80 million current US$ | Russia |
| 2000s | 2.90 million current US$ | 23.99 million current US$ | 21.09 million current US$ | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps, Brazil or Russia?
- Brazil, at 29.86 million current US$ against 29.62 million current US$ in Russia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps between Brazil and Russia?
- 235,600 current US$, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Russia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Brazil and Russia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
- Brazil ranks 21st and Russia ranks 22nd of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.