Cape Verde vs Czechia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps
Cape Verde
58,038 current US$
in 2014
Czechia
60,000 current US$
in 2004
Cape Verde rank
116th
Czechia rank
115th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps over time
- Cape Verde
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 60,000 current US$ against 58,038 current US$ in Cape Verde, a difference of 1,962 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 116th and Czechia ranks 115th of 143 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 370,000 current US$ | 636,500 current US$ | 266,500 current US$ | Czechia |
| 2000s | 76,000 current US$ | 108,000 current US$ | 32,000 current US$ | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps, Cape Verde or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 60,000 current US$ against 58,038 current US$ in Cape Verde as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps between Cape Verde and Czechia?
- 1,962 current US$, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Czechia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Cape Verde and Czechia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
- Cape Verde ranks 116th and Czechia ranks 115th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.