Costa Rica vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps
Costa Rica
19,775 current US$
in 2016
Singapore
20,000 current US$
in 1985
Costa Rica rank
126th
Singapore rank
124th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps over time
- Costa Rica
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 20,000 current US$ against 19,775 current US$ in Costa Rica, a difference of 225 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 126th and Singapore ranks 124th of 143 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 15,500 current US$ | 16,000 current US$ | 500 current US$ | Singapore |
| 1980s | 385,000 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 365,000 current US$ | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps, Costa Rica or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 20,000 current US$ against 19,775 current US$ in Costa Rica as of 1985.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps between Costa Rica and Singapore?
- 225 current US$, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Singapore?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 1985.
- How do Costa Rica and Singapore rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
- Costa Rica ranks 126th and Singapore ranks 124th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.