Equatorial Guinea vs Fiji: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Fiji
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 43,936 current US$ against 40,000 current US$ in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 3,936 current US$.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 120th and Fiji ranks 119th of 143 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 25,833 current US$ | 90,000 current US$ | 64,167 current US$ | Fiji |
| 2000s | 40,000 current US$ | 60,000 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps, Equatorial Guinea or Fiji?
- Fiji, at 43,936 current US$ against 40,000 current US$ in Equatorial Guinea as of 2016.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps between Equatorial Guinea and Fiji?
- 3,936 current US$, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Fiji?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2001.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Fiji rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 120th and Fiji ranks 119th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.