Europe & Central Asia vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps

Europe & Central Asia
859.46 million current US$
in 2023
Malawi
51.76 million current US$
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia rank
11th
Malawi rank
11th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Malawi
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M196019912023

How they compare

Europe & Central Asia currently reports 859.46 million current US$ against 51.76 million current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 807.69 million current US$.

That makes Europe & Central Asia's figure about 16.6 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Europe & Central Asia ahead.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 11th and Malawi ranks 11th of 45 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia averaged higher in 5 and Malawi in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 510,000 current US$ 10,000 current US$ 500,000 current US$ Europe & Central Asia
1970s -32,500 current US$ 27,500 current US$ 60,000 current US$ Malawi
1980s 935,714 current US$ 943,571 current US$ 7,857 current US$ Malawi
1990s 61.17 million current US$ 6.37 million current US$ 54.80 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia
2000s 127.39 million current US$ 36.96 million current US$ 90.43 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia
2010s 86.44 million current US$ 70.10 million current US$ 16.34 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia
2020s 393.96 million current US$ 51.96 million current US$ 342.00 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps, Europe & Central Asia or Malawi?
Europe & Central Asia, at 859.46 million current US$ against 51.76 million current US$ in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps between Europe & Central Asia and Malawi?
807.69 million current US$, with Europe & Central Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Malawi?
46 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Malawi rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 11th and Malawi ranks 11th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/europe-and-central-asia/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/europe-and-central-asia/malawi/">Europe & Central Asia vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 8,011 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.