Fiji vs Suriname: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps
Fiji
43,936 current US$
in 2016
Suriname
30,000 current US$
in 2004
Fiji rank
119th
Suriname rank
121st
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps over time
- Fiji
- Suriname
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 43,936 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 13,936 current US$.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.5 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Suriname ahead.
Fiji ranks 119th and Suriname ranks 121st of 143 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 44,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 34,000 current US$ | Fiji |
| 2000s | 32,500 current US$ | 30,000 current US$ | 2,500 current US$ | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps, Fiji or Suriname?
- Fiji, at 43,936 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in Suriname as of 2016.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps between Fiji and Suriname?
- 13,936 current US$, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Suriname?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2004.
- How do Fiji and Suriname rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
- Fiji ranks 119th and Suriname ranks 121st of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.