High income vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps

High income
1.10 million current US$
in 2023
Zimbabwe
6.81 million current US$
in 2023
High income rank
43rd
Zimbabwe rank
40th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps over time

  • High income
  • Zimbabwe
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M196019912023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 6.81 million current US$ against 1.10 million current US$ in High income, a difference of 5.71 million current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 6.2 times High income's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

High income ranks 43rd and Zimbabwe ranks 40th of 45 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, High income averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade High income Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 1.46 million current US$ 13.03 million current US$ 11.57 million current US$ Zimbabwe
1990s 8.94 million current US$ 18.65 million current US$ 9.71 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 23.21 million current US$ 12.94 million current US$ 10.28 million current US$ High income
2010s 29.61 million current US$ 18.58 million current US$ 11.03 million current US$ High income
2020s 3.23 million current US$ 6.08 million current US$ 2.84 million current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps, High income or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 6.81 million current US$ against 1.10 million current US$ in High income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps between High income and Zimbabwe?
5.71 million current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Zimbabwe?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do High income and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
High income ranks 43rd and Zimbabwe ranks 40th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

High income vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/high-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/high-income/zimbabwe/">High income vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 8,011 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.