Hong Kong, China vs Namibia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 24,725 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 4,725 current US$.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Hong Kong, China's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 124th and Namibia ranks 123rd of 143 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 72,500 current US$ | 177,500 current US$ | 105,000 current US$ | Namibia |
| 1990s | 20,000 current US$ | 10.79 million current US$ | 10.77 million current US$ | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps, Hong Kong, China or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 24,725 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps between Hong Kong, China and Namibia?
- 4,725 current US$, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 1995.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Namibia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 124th and Namibia ranks 123rd of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.