IBRD only vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps

IBRD only
939.91 million current US$
in 2022
South Sudan
78.19 million current US$
in 2023
IBRD only rank
9th
South Sudan rank
6th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps over time

  • IBRD only
  • South Sudan
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B197019962023

How they compare

IBRD only currently reports 939.91 million current US$ against 78.19 million current US$ in South Sudan, a difference of 861.72 million current US$.

That makes IBRD only's figure about 12.0 times South Sudan's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, IBRD only has been ahead every year.

IBRD only ranks 9th and South Sudan ranks 6th of 45 groups.

IBRD only has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 519.63 million current US$ 73.63 million current US$ 446.00 million current US$ IBRD only
2020s 557.73 million current US$ 69.54 million current US$ 488.19 million current US$ IBRD only

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps, IBRD only or South Sudan?
IBRD only, at 939.91 million current US$ against 78.19 million current US$ in South Sudan as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps between IBRD only and South Sudan?
861.72 million current US$, with IBRD only ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and South Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
How do IBRD only and South Sudan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
IBRD only ranks 9th and South Sudan ranks 6th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/ibrd-only/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/ibrd-only/south-sudan/">IBRD only vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 8,011 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.