IDA blend vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps

IDA blend
58.49 million current US$
in 2022
Zimbabwe
6.81 million current US$
in 2023
IDA blend rank
38th
Zimbabwe rank
40th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps over time

  • IDA blend
  • Zimbabwe
050.0M100.0M150.0M197019962023

How they compare

IDA blend currently reports 58.49 million current US$ against 6.81 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 51.68 million current US$.

That makes IDA blend's figure about 8.6 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 43 years both countries report, IDA blend has been ahead every year.

IDA blend ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 40th of 45 groups.

IDA blend has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA blend Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 52.16 million current US$ 13.03 million current US$ 39.13 million current US$ IDA blend
1990s 35.16 million current US$ 18.65 million current US$ 16.51 million current US$ IDA blend
2000s 64.10 million current US$ 12.94 million current US$ 51.16 million current US$ IDA blend
2010s 82.85 million current US$ 18.58 million current US$ 64.27 million current US$ IDA blend
2020s 51.73 million current US$ 5.83 million current US$ 45.90 million current US$ IDA blend

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps, IDA blend or Zimbabwe?
IDA blend, at 58.49 million current US$ against 6.81 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps between IDA blend and Zimbabwe?
51.68 million current US$, with IDA blend ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Zimbabwe?
43 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2022.
How do IDA blend and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
IDA blend ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 40th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA blend vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/ida-blend/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/ida-blend/zimbabwe/">IDA blend vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 8,011 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.