IDA only vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps

IDA only
882.01 million current US$
in 2022
Tanzania, United Republic of
51.14 million current US$
in 2023
IDA only rank
10th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
12th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps over time

  • IDA only
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B1.2B196219922023

How they compare

IDA only currently reports 882.01 million current US$ against 51.14 million current US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 830.87 million current US$.

That makes IDA only's figure about 17.2 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, IDA only has been ahead every year.

IDA only ranks 10th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 12th of 45 groups.

IDA only has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA only Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1970s 45.12 million current US$ 14.85 million current US$ 30.27 million current US$ IDA only
1980s 200.99 million current US$ 56.64 million current US$ 144.34 million current US$ IDA only
1990s 393.76 million current US$ 64.12 million current US$ 329.64 million current US$ IDA only
2000s 707.19 million current US$ 73.78 million current US$ 633.41 million current US$ IDA only
2010s 993.13 million current US$ 73.52 million current US$ 919.60 million current US$ IDA only
2020s 887.55 million current US$ 46.46 million current US$ 841.09 million current US$ IDA only

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps, IDA only or Tanzania, United Republic of?
IDA only, at 882.01 million current US$ against 51.14 million current US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps between IDA only and Tanzania, United Republic of?
830.87 million current US$, with IDA only ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Tanzania, United Republic of?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do IDA only and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
IDA only ranks 10th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 12th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA only vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/ida-only/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/ida-only/tanzania/">IDA only vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 8,011 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.