Latvia vs Mexico: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps
Latvia
290,000 current US$
in 2004
Mexico
284,104 current US$
in 2023
Latvia rank
91st
Mexico rank
92nd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps over time
- Latvia
- Mexico
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 290,000 current US$ against 284,104 current US$ in Mexico, a difference of 5,896 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Mexico ahead.
Latvia ranks 91st and Mexico ranks 92nd of 143 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.47 million current US$ | 409,444 current US$ | 1.06 million current US$ | Latvia |
| 2000s | 586,000 current US$ | 336,000 current US$ | 250,000 current US$ | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps, Latvia or Mexico?
- Latvia, at 290,000 current US$ against 284,104 current US$ in Mexico as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps between Latvia and Mexico?
- 5,896 current US$, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mexico?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Latvia and Mexico rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
- Latvia ranks 91st and Mexico ranks 92nd of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.