OECD members vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps

OECD members
61.24 million current US$
in 2022
Zimbabwe
6.81 million current US$
in 2023
OECD members rank
37th
Zimbabwe rank
40th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps over time

  • OECD members
  • Zimbabwe
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M197019962023

How they compare

OECD members currently reports 61.24 million current US$ against 6.81 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 54.43 million current US$.

That makes OECD members's figure about 9.0 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1980 it was OECD members ahead.

OECD members ranks 37th and Zimbabwe ranks 40th of 45 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, OECD members averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 2.37 million current US$ 13.03 million current US$ 10.66 million current US$ Zimbabwe
1990s 25.63 million current US$ 18.65 million current US$ 6.99 million current US$ OECD members
2000s 25.17 million current US$ 12.94 million current US$ 12.23 million current US$ OECD members
2010s 44.19 million current US$ 18.58 million current US$ 25.61 million current US$ OECD members
2020s 66.21 million current US$ 5.83 million current US$ 60.38 million current US$ OECD members

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps, OECD members or Zimbabwe?
OECD members, at 61.24 million current US$ against 6.81 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps between OECD members and Zimbabwe?
54.43 million current US$, with OECD members ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Zimbabwe?
43 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2022.
How do OECD members and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
OECD members ranks 37th and Zimbabwe ranks 40th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/oecd-members/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-gaps-filled/oecd-members/zimbabwe/">OECD members vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 8,011 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.