Romania vs Sierra Leone: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps over time
- Romania
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Romania currently reports 800,000 current US$ against 732,304 current US$ in Sierra Leone, a difference of 67,696 current US$.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 75th and Sierra Leone ranks 76th of 143 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 452,000 current US$ | 3.05 million current US$ | 2.60 million current US$ | Sierra Leone |
| 2000s | 546,000 current US$ | 7.80 million current US$ | 7.26 million current US$ | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps, Romania or Sierra Leone?
- Romania, at 800,000 current US$ against 732,304 current US$ in Sierra Leone as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps between Romania and Sierra Leone?
- 67,696 current US$, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Sierra Leone?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Romania and Sierra Leone rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), gaps?
- Romania ranks 75th and Sierra Leone ranks 76th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) with 370 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.