Least developed countries vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

Least developed countries
0.6819 current US$ per person
in 2022
Malawi
2.45 current US$ per person
in 2023
Least developed countries rank
11th
Malawi rank
8th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Malawi
0246196619942023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 2.45 current US$ per person against 0.6819 current US$ per person in Least developed countries, a difference of 1.77 current US$ per person.

That makes Malawi's figure about 3.6 times Least developed countries's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Least developed countries ahead.

Least developed countries ranks 11th and Malawi ranks 8th of 44 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Least developed countries averaged higher in 3 and Malawi in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0923 current US$ per person 0.0052 current US$ per person 0.0871 current US$ per person Least developed countries
1980s 0.451 current US$ per person 0.1192 current US$ per person 0.3317 current US$ per person Least developed countries
1990s 0.6225 current US$ per person 0.6099 current US$ per person 0.0126 current US$ per person Least developed countries
2000s 0.8759 current US$ per person 2.79 current US$ per person 1.92 current US$ per person Malawi
2010s 0.9186 current US$ per person 4.2 current US$ per person 3.29 current US$ per person Malawi
2020s 0.695 current US$ per person 2.6 current US$ per person 1.9 current US$ per person Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Least developed countries or Malawi?
Malawi, at 2.45 current US$ per person against 0.6819 current US$ per person in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Least developed countries and Malawi?
1.77 current US$ per person, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Malawi?
43 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2022.
How do Least developed countries and Malawi rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Least developed countries ranks 11th and Malawi ranks 8th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-capita/least-developed-countries-un-classification/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-capita/least-developed-countries-un-classification/malawi/">Least developed countries vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 7,641 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.