Argentina vs Botswana: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

Argentina
0.0569 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana
0.1014 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
133rd
Botswana rank
130th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • Argentina
  • Botswana
01020304050196919962023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.1014 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0569 current US$ per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 0.0445 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.8 times Argentina's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 133rd and Botswana ranks 130th of 142 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Botswana Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0073 current US$ per square kilometre 6.42 current US$ per square kilometre 6.42 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 0.0305 current US$ per square kilometre 23.05 current US$ per square kilometre 23.02 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 0.0061 current US$ per square kilometre 22.51 current US$ per square kilometre 22.51 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 0.0309 current US$ per square kilometre 4.23 current US$ per square kilometre 4.2 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 0.023 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6747 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6516 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 0.0513 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0916 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0403 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Argentina or Botswana?
Botswana, at 0.1014 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0569 current US$ per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Argentina and Botswana?
0.0445 current US$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Botswana?
32 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Botswana rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Argentina ranks 133rd and Botswana ranks 130th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Botswana: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/botswana/">Argentina vs Botswana: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.