Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

Bangladesh
121.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
129 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
17th
Rwanda rank
14th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Rwanda
02004006008001.0k197119972023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 129 current US$ per square kilometre against 121.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 7.91 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 17th and Rwanda ranks 14th of 142 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 131.52 current US$ per square kilometre 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre 130.3 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 209.76 current US$ per square kilometre 33.24 current US$ per square kilometre 176.53 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 285.18 current US$ per square kilometre 309.36 current US$ per square kilometre 24.18 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 171.81 current US$ per square kilometre 201.99 current US$ per square kilometre 30.17 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 92.82 current US$ per square kilometre 139.05 current US$ per square kilometre 46.24 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 121.63 current US$ per square kilometre 209.73 current US$ per square kilometre 88.1 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Bangladesh or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 129 current US$ per square kilometre against 121.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Bangladesh and Rwanda?
7.91 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Rwanda?
41 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Bangladesh ranks 17th and Rwanda ranks 14th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/rwanda/">Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.