Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

Bangladesh
121.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
74.15 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
17th
Sri Lanka rank
19th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Sri Lanka
02505007501.0k196519942023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 121.09 current US$ per square kilometre against 74.15 current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 46.94 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.6 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 17th and Sri Lanka ranks 19th of 142 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 80.97 current US$ per square kilometre 31.63 current US$ per square kilometre 49.34 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 219.94 current US$ per square kilometre 200.22 current US$ per square kilometre 19.72 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 285.18 current US$ per square kilometre 264.14 current US$ per square kilometre 21.04 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 171.81 current US$ per square kilometre 515.47 current US$ per square kilometre 343.65 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 92.82 current US$ per square kilometre 218.76 current US$ per square kilometre 125.95 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 121.63 current US$ per square kilometre 100.56 current US$ per square kilometre 21.07 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Bangladesh or Sri Lanka?
Bangladesh, at 121.09 current US$ per square kilometre against 74.15 current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Bangladesh and Sri Lanka?
46.94 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Sri Lanka?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Sri Lanka rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Bangladesh ranks 17th and Sri Lanka ranks 19th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/sri-lanka/">Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.