Costa Rica vs Côte d'Ivoire: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

Costa Rica
0.3873 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2016
Côte d'Ivoire
0.3147 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
123rd
Côte d'Ivoire rank
124th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Côte d'Ivoire
050100150196619942023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.3873 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.3147 current US$ per square kilometre in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.0726 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Côte d'Ivoire's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 123rd and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 124th of 142 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Difference Ahead
1970s 1.18 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4403 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7348 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 6.68 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5542 current US$ per square kilometre 6.13 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 13.92 current US$ per square kilometre 5.5 current US$ per square kilometre 8.42 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 28.03 current US$ per square kilometre 7.47 current US$ per square kilometre 20.55 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 28.75 current US$ per square kilometre 9.11 current US$ per square kilometre 19.64 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Costa Rica or Côte d'Ivoire?
Costa Rica, at 0.3873 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.3147 current US$ per square kilometre in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2016.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Costa Rica and Côte d'Ivoire?
0.0726 current US$ per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Côte d'Ivoire?
36 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2016.
How do Costa Rica and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Costa Rica ranks 123rd and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 124th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Côte d'Ivoire: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/cote-d-ivoire/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/cote-d-ivoire/">Costa Rica vs Côte d'Ivoire: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.