Ecuador vs Peru: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

Ecuador
12.81 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
12.02 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
55th
Peru rank
58th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • Ecuador
  • Peru
0255075100196419932023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 12.81 current US$ per square kilometre against 12.02 current US$ per square kilometre in Peru, a difference of 0.79 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Peru ahead.

Ecuador ranks 55th and Peru ranks 58th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Peru in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0361 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0391 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0029 current US$ per square kilometre Peru
1970s 0.3106 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0484 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2622 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 1.42 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6352 current US$ per square kilometre 0.788 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 4.38 current US$ per square kilometre 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre 2.98 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 9.19 current US$ per square kilometre 12.17 current US$ per square kilometre 2.98 current US$ per square kilometre Peru
2010s 18.16 current US$ per square kilometre 5.44 current US$ per square kilometre 12.71 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 24.03 current US$ per square kilometre 8.64 current US$ per square kilometre 15.39 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Ecuador or Peru?
Ecuador, at 12.81 current US$ per square kilometre against 12.02 current US$ per square kilometre in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Ecuador and Peru?
0.79 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Peru?
50 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Peru rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Ecuador ranks 55th and Peru ranks 58th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Peru: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/peru/">Ecuador vs Peru: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.