Eswatini vs Guatemala: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

Eswatini
39.05 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
49.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
30th
Guatemala rank
29th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Guatemala
050100150200197119972023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 49.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 39.05 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 10.09 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.3 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 30th and Guatemala ranks 29th of 142 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Guatemala in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Guatemala Difference Ahead
1970s 12.06 current US$ per square kilometre 3.24 current US$ per square kilometre 8.82 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 9.4 current US$ per square kilometre 8.8 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5962 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 20.99 current US$ per square kilometre 82.5 current US$ per square kilometre 61.51 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 48.31 current US$ per square kilometre 116.31 current US$ per square kilometre 68 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 58.09 current US$ per square kilometre 80.6 current US$ per square kilometre 22.51 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 41.13 current US$ per square kilometre 46.75 current US$ per square kilometre 5.62 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Eswatini or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 49.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 39.05 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Eswatini and Guatemala?
10.09 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guatemala?
43 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Guatemala rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Eswatini ranks 30th and Guatemala ranks 29th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Guatemala: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/guatemala/">Eswatini vs Guatemala: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.