Eswatini vs IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

Eswatini
39.05 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only
13.28 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Eswatini rank
30th
IBRD only rank
27th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • Eswatini
  • IBRD only
050100150200197019962023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 39.05 current US$ per square kilometre against 13.28 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 25.77 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 2.9 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 30th and IBRD only ranks 27th of 142 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini IBRD only Difference Ahead
1970s 10.03 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4718 current US$ per square kilometre 9.56 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 9.4 current US$ per square kilometre 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre 7.96 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 20.99 current US$ per square kilometre 3.18 current US$ per square kilometre 17.81 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 48.31 current US$ per square kilometre 4.91 current US$ per square kilometre 43.4 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 58.09 current US$ per square kilometre 7.13 current US$ per square kilometre 50.95 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 41.83 current US$ per square kilometre 7.88 current US$ per square kilometre 33.95 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Eswatini or IBRD only?
Eswatini, at 39.05 current US$ per square kilometre against 13.28 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Eswatini and IBRD only?
25.77 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and IBRD only?
46 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2022.
How do Eswatini and IBRD only rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Eswatini ranks 30th and IBRD only ranks 27th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/ibrd-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/ibrd-only/">Eswatini vs IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.