Guatemala vs IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

Guatemala
49.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only
13.28 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Guatemala rank
29th
IBRD only rank
27th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • Guatemala
  • IBRD only
050100150200197019962023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 49.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 13.28 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 35.86 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 3.7 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1974 it was IBRD only ahead.

Guatemala ranks 29th and IBRD only ranks 27th of 142 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala IBRD only Difference Ahead
1970s 3.24 current US$ per square kilometre 0.569 current US$ per square kilometre 2.67 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 7.64 current US$ per square kilometre 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre 6.25 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 81.7 current US$ per square kilometre 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre 78.49 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 116.31 current US$ per square kilometre 4.91 current US$ per square kilometre 111.4 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 80.6 current US$ per square kilometre 7.13 current US$ per square kilometre 73.47 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 45.95 current US$ per square kilometre 7.88 current US$ per square kilometre 38.07 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Guatemala or IBRD only?
Guatemala, at 49.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 13.28 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Guatemala and IBRD only?
35.86 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and IBRD only?
45 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2022.
How do Guatemala and IBRD only rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Guatemala ranks 29th and IBRD only ranks 27th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/ibrd-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/ibrd-only/">Guatemala vs IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.