Guatemala vs IDA blend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

Guatemala
49.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA blend
11.9 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Guatemala rank
29th
IDA blend rank
28th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • Guatemala
  • IDA blend
050100150200197019962023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 49.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 11.9 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA blend, a difference of 37.24 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 4.1 times IDA blend's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1974 it was IDA blend ahead.

Guatemala ranks 29th and IDA blend ranks 28th of 142 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 4 and IDA blend in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala IDA blend Difference Ahead
1970s 3.24 current US$ per square kilometre 4.41 current US$ per square kilometre 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre IDA blend
1980s 7.64 current US$ per square kilometre 11.96 current US$ per square kilometre 4.32 current US$ per square kilometre IDA blend
1990s 81.7 current US$ per square kilometre 7.39 current US$ per square kilometre 74.31 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 116.31 current US$ per square kilometre 13.09 current US$ per square kilometre 103.23 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 80.6 current US$ per square kilometre 16.9 current US$ per square kilometre 63.7 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 45.95 current US$ per square kilometre 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre 35.42 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Guatemala or IDA blend?
Guatemala, at 49.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 11.9 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA blend as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Guatemala and IDA blend?
37.24 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and IDA blend?
45 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2022.
How do Guatemala and IDA blend rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Guatemala ranks 29th and IDA blend ranks 28th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs IDA blend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/ida-blend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/ida-blend/">Guatemala vs IDA blend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.