Guatemala vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

Guatemala
49.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
57.73 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
29th
Tanzania rank
27th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • Guatemala
  • Tanzania
050100150200196219922023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 57.73 current US$ per square kilometre against 49.14 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 8.59 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.2 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Tanzania ahead.

Guatemala ranks 29th and Tanzania ranks 27th of 142 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 3.24 current US$ per square kilometre 19.21 current US$ per square kilometre 15.97 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1980s 7.64 current US$ per square kilometre 66.95 current US$ per square kilometre 59.31 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1990s 81.7 current US$ per square kilometre 72.39 current US$ per square kilometre 9.31 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 116.31 current US$ per square kilometre 83.29 current US$ per square kilometre 33.02 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 80.6 current US$ per square kilometre 83 current US$ per square kilometre 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2020s 46.75 current US$ per square kilometre 53.77 current US$ per square kilometre 7.02 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Guatemala or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 57.73 current US$ per square kilometre against 49.14 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Guatemala and Tanzania?
8.59 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Tanzania?
46 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Tanzania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Guatemala ranks 29th and Tanzania ranks 27th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/tanzania/">Guatemala vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.